For the record: I signed the ITU transparency petition

Modest request that Touré can easily accept. Just before Busan, Carolina Rossini of Public Knowledge led a set of civil society groups in a letter that makes sensible suggestions for the ITU. It was far more to the point than so many of the U.S. and Russian attempts at provocation. I was happy to sign, alongside EFF, the World Wide Web Foundation, APC, CDT and others. Webcasting more of the event, meeting regularly with civil society, having anonline contribution mechanism for all and opening more meetings are simple, sensible steps. In fact, Hamadoun has been actively working on several of these. The ITU is a body of politicians and isn’t perfect, but most of the popular criticism comes from a negative political campaign.

   At WCIT, Harold Feld and others from civil society organized a small caucus. I told a friend at ITU and the next day Hamadoun and the caucus had an informal meeting. There’s every reason for them to do more. Several of the recent ITU meetings featured “Informal Expert Groups” that were essentially open to all and proved effective. A platform open to all may be impractical to put together in a few days but is always good. Then, the Internet Society or any friendly government – even the U.S. – could add it to the record. At WCIT, the ITU made available to attendees the complete  registration list including most emails. That means that anyone there, including civil society, has the emails and can reach 80-90% of the attendees more effectively than getting into the conference 

   See you in Busan in weeks 2 & 3.

Open letter to the ITU on transparency of its Plenipotentiary in Busan


TO: Secretary General of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Dr. Hamadoun Touré
CC: Deputy Secretary-General of the ITU, Mr Houlin Zhao

Dear Secretary-General Touré,

We write to you as a group of civil society organisations who are keen to engage with the important work of the ITU and its upcoming Plenipotentiary Conference.

At various ITU meetings in the recent past, positive steps have been taken to facilitate and encourage the engagement of stakeholders in the work of the ITU and to increase transparency of the organization and its processes. Efforts were made at the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT), the World Telecommunication Policy Forum (WTPF) and the WSIS+10 Multistakeholder Preparatory Platform (MPP), all of which helped to further increase recognition within the ITU of the importance of opening up its processes more generally.

These moves towards greater openness and inclusivity were also lauded in your speech at the WSIS+10 High Level Event in June 2014: “As the ITU Secretary-General, I’m nonetheless very proud that these two documents have been developed by a bottom up and all inclusive approach, exercising truemultistakeholderism with the highest level of openness.”

The undersigned organizations have been encouraged by this evolution and believe that it is now time – at the ITU Plenipotentiary in Busan and as the ITU nears its 150th birthday – for the organization to do more to demonstrate its commitment to openness and to welcome greater and more diverse participation in its processes from across all stakeholder groups.

We understand that the ITU will be webcasting some of the proceedings of the Plenipotentiary including Plenary Sessions, Plenary Working Group, Committee 5 and Committee 6.  We welcome these commitments and encourage the ITU to webcast all Committee proceedings.

In addition, we encourage the ITU to:

  • Open the Plenipotentiary Plenary and Committee Sessions to on-site observers, regardless of their participation status. This would provide an opportunity for public interest groups and other interested organizations to participate at the Plenipotentiary without the constraints imposed by participation through national delegations.
  • Organize regular briefings for civil society at the Conference. We understand that the ITU is already considering holding briefings with civil society representatives, and welcome this. We encourage the ITU to facilitate such briefings and to use them as an opportunity to share information on the progress of the discussions and negotiations, as well as to solicit civil society feedback on the proceedings.
  • Create an online public contribution platform (as there was at the WCIT) and register such contributions as official Information Documents. Delegations and participants should be encouraged to take such contributions into account during their deliberations.
  • Highlight the benefits of openness and transparency in an effort to formalize greater public access to ITU processes and documentation.

We believe that wider participation and greater openness are critical to enable all stakeholders to deepen their understanding of the ITU’s mandate and role and constructively engage with the important work the ITU does. We urge the ITU to seize the opportunity presented by the Plenipotentiary to take the next steps towards true inclusion and collaboration. We also urge the ITU to continue and strengthen its involvement in global and regional multi-stakeholder forums such as IGFs.

We remain available and committed to collaboration with the ITU Secretary General, the ITU Secretariat, and all other relevant individuals and bodies within the ITU to work towards a more inclusive, transparent and accountable ITU.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to top